To "rationalize" means to make something "rational" - and, at the most
practical level, "rational" means nothing more than "understandable (and
acceptable) to the mind". What is completely rational to one person
can be completely irrational to someone else - like those who call
something "mental gymnastics" that is totally understandable and
acceptable to the mind of person who believes it.
We all
rationalize, generally to the same extent. We just reach different
conclusions than others do - and, because we can't understand and accept
others' decisions, we label others' decisions negatively as
"rationalizations" while not doing so to our own. (Those who are more
intellectual in nature tend to love the word "rational" but not the word
"rationalize" - which is deliciously ironic to me.) We also tend to
make this criticism about conclusions that are the most removed from our
own - which is why prophets / visionaries / charismatics / etc. tend to
be loved or hated, accepted or rejected, praised or reviled and have
very few indifferent reactions. They usually inspire intense
admiration or just as intense revulsion - and that is both good and bad.
I personally am wherever I am on each and every issue and
topic, which has caused some people to complain that I am wishy-washy or
too hard to characterize. They want me to be consistently on the same
side of a line on everything, and I simply am not that way. I attempt to find a view that is rational to me in each and every case - which means I am conservative, moderate and liberal depending on the specific issue. If there is
a consistent standard I try to recognize, it is the line between charity and
judgmentalism - but even that isn't always a bright line, since, ultimately, it is based on my own reasoning and rationalization.
Top Heavy
2 weeks ago
No comments:
Post a Comment