From my own experience in various responsibilities dealing with the issue of pornography over the years, the following are
some important points I think need to be understood when talking about pornography:
1) There are many Victorian
attitudes that mess up people's understanding of what healthy sex can
include. I can't stress that enough at the beginning of this post, since it's a huge problem in our
current religious culture.
2) I believe there are lots of
things that are perfectly fine and healthy that are repressed generally
in our modern Mormon culture (far more than was the case in the early
days of the LDS Church).
3) Talking about pornography constantly from the pulpit often stimulates those who are struggling with it in some way. It's like talking with an alcoholic about alcohol every day.
4) Having said that, there
are many elements of pornography (hard-core porn, especially) that are not
examples of "healthy" sex - and, in many cases, marital issues arise
when a spouse (a husband or wife) begins to want and expect the other
spouse to act like the people in the porn - or, knowing there is no way
the other spouse is going to act like the people in the porn, uses porn
as an outlet for fantasies revolving around those unhealthy practices.
5) Mainstream porn (as opposed to specific sub-categories) tends to portray extremes in sex - and I don't just mean "extreme
activities" when I say that. There is never "average sex" - sex that isn't "perfect";
there is never sex that is a compromise when one person really isn't
feeling it; there is never a statement of "No, I'm not comfortable with that" and an
acknowledgment and acceptance by the person who is wants what the other person is unwilling to do; there never is anything that involves real discussion and "middle
ground" of any kind. At the most extreme, there are lots of things that
are "extreme", in and of themselves, by any reasonable definition -
including things that are cruel, controlling, sadistic and, literally,
based on the elimination of agency and love. Lots of porn is
"dehumanizing" in the sense that it removes individuality and focuses
solely on the animalistic nature of the physical activity to the
exclusion of everything else that involves intimacy and being human.
6)
This restates #4 and builds on #5, but the extremes that are the norm
often lead to unrealistic expectations, and that can put enormous
pressure on spouses to accept things they naturally wouldn't accept -
and enormous pressure on the one with those expectations to find an
avenue for those expectations to be met. That combination can be very
destructive in a relationship.
7) Finally, porn as an industry
is brutal for many of those who are involved. I won't go into details
here, but it is as repulsive as anything I've ever researched.
It
is very similar to prostitution in some ways - the disease rate, the
lack of decent health insurance, the lack of long-term employment (for
lots of reasons), the preying on people who get into it out of
desperation or to make money while pursuing other dreams that never
materialize as they get "used up" by the industry; the huge underground
reliance on runaways and youth, in general, especially in other
countries but even in the USA. The celebrities in the industry get all
the attention and make it look glamorous, but those who constitute the
"fodder" pay a huge price - and, again, that's even here in America.
The porn industry in other countries is nearly unspeakable and truly
vile and evil.
Seriously, the research is horrific.
Again,
using prostitution as an example, I live in Nevada - where prostitution
is legal and "ladies ranches" are common. There is one just outside
Carson City, where I live, that is the focus of an HBO show.
Apparently, the show makes prostitution at that ranch look somewhat
glamorous - but I know a woman who wrote a book about the industry in
Nevada who visited lots of ladies ranches, interviewed owners and the
women who work there and talked about what life actually is like for
them. They often are forbidden to leave without supervision (since the owners
don't want them to leave or to get paid for anything that can be hidden
from them, thus cutting into their profits); the managerial take is
comparable to what pimps get through illegal prostitution; women are
discarded immediately, with no financial security, if they get AIDS or
any other "serious" sexual disease; "minor" sexual infections are
overlooked and not disclosed to the "customers"; etc. One owner, portrayed as a benevolent father figure publicly, referred to the women who work there as "my stock" - literally, in the
exact same way a rancher speaks of his cattle. In many cases, pimps
from California transport their "stable" to Nevada and employ them at
the ranches - taking their own cut on top of the owner's cut - leaving
the women with next to nothing except a roof over their heads until they
go back to their home turf.
Finally, pornography can be highly
addictive - and it's created specifically by its producers to be as
addictive as possible. There are ranges of porn (soft-core vs.
hard-core and lots of degrees all along a scale), but, just like any
other commodity in our society, it has been researched extensively to be
marketable. I view pornography as perhaps the best example we have of
addiction peddling and the result of "evil which does and will exist in
the hearts of conspiring men in the latter days" - and I've done enough
research and known enough people over the years to feel strongly about
that, even as I also recognize how screwed up our view of sex is and how
much that contributes to the problem with pornography that exists in our culture.
The biggest reasons we have a difficult time addressing pornography correctly, in my opinion, are the conflation of nudity with porn
and the Puritanical attitudes about and obsession with sex in general.
There is nothing wrong with sexual urges and thoughts, in and of
themselves, but we have created a culture in which almost anything that is
sexual in nature is being repressed. Repression doesn't work; it only
leads to explosion - and explosion is seen as gross iniquity - which
leads to depression and extreme guilt - which perpetuates a cycle.
Finally, we tend to view issues with viewing pornography much more harshly than other issues with addiction or varying levels of consumption. We feel badly for an alcoholic and generally don't "punish" him; rather, we feel sorry for the person and do everything in our power to love her - including referrals to Alcoholics Anonymous or other professional help. In the LDS Church, we do not excommunicate someone for struggling with alcoholic consumption - or even disfellowship him or require probation. On the other hand, official discipline and punishment often is the track taken in dealing with viewing pornography - even if there is no abuse or other actionable issue involved (and, as a commenter pointed out, even though the Church Handbook of Instructions says clearly that discipline is NOT appropriate for those struggling with pornography, masturbation or the Word of Wisdom). Thus, many members who struggle to any degree with pornography face the very real possibility that their struggles will not be met with love and compassion and professional referral but, instead, formal punishment and, in some cases, threat of divorce and the destruction of their lives - even in situations that would not be classified as clinical addiction.
How we treat these people (with direct punishment [both organizational and individual] and social shaming) contributes directly to most of them never confessing their problem and seeking help, which contributes to a vicious cycle of attempted repression as the only viable solution, which rarely succeeds over the long haul.
So, what is my advice?
Preach against pornography, but don't hammer away constantly. Understand the similarity for many people to those who struggle with alcohol consumption, and treat each person with the same foundation of love and compassion. Provide opportunities for confession and therapy (whether with a counselor or through an addiction recovery program) without automatic, official punishment. Encourage spouses not to threaten or consider divorce automatically, except in cases of severe addiction or when it causes other serious issues in marriage.
There is more, but what is outlined above would be a wonderful starting point.
Top Heavy
2 weeks ago
6 comments:
I shared the following in a private message to a friend:
"Porn can become a real addiction in many cases, although it is not in many others. Addictions are difficult to overcome. Results can't happen immediately in most cases, and, just like alcoholism, some people will have to fight it the rest of their lives. It will be their own "thorn of the flesh". We simply must understand and accept that - and quit judging and blaming people if they are unable to conquer that addiction quickly or even fully."
I want to add that we have to help them up when they fall, not punish them for falling.
Is there any place for a discussion on masturbation on this topic. I would surmise that many members, convinced of the evils of masturbation, do anything they can to not "touch" but try to alleviate the urge by looking elsewhere. Oftentimes that leads them to the internet and the slippery slope begins. If the Church destigmatized masturbation and acknowledged its place as a "safety valve," do you see the porn problem getting better?
"On the other hand, official discipline and punishment often is the track taken in dealing with viewing pornography - even if there is no abuse or other actionable issue involved." This is an incorrect statement. Handbook 1 expressly states no disciplinary councils are to be held for those struggling with pornography. See Handbook 1, 6.7.1 Or word of wisdom or masturbation, for that matter.
Greg, the short answer is, "Yes." I could have written a different post about masturbation.
Anonymous, if all local leaders followed the handbook properly, the statement would be incorrect, and I should have included that aspect in the original post. (I will update it to make that point.) Unfortunately, not all do, so the statement is correct. It ought not be, according to the official policy, but it still is in WAY too many cases.
I think the horror with which such indiscretions are met by spouses triggers the reactions of others in authority, but the root of this is in the extent to which women in the church have become de-sexualised. We have come to see sexuality as evidence of our fallen state which is of course doctrinally mistaken.
I really look forward to the day when we can all take responsibility for our sexual feelings and rejoice in them in our marriages as both women and men.Good sex in the proper place, a sex positive message which has somehow become lost to view.
I really liked Sister Reeves talk. I thought she was really positive.
For example:
"One reason we are here on earth is to learn to manage the passions and feelings of our mortal bodies. These God-given feelings help us want to marry and have children. The intimate marriage relationship between a man and a woman that brings children into mortality is also meant to be a beautiful, loving experience that binds together two devoted hearts, unites both spirit and body, and brings a fulness of joy and happiness as we learn to put each other first." https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2014/04/protection-from-pornography-a-christ-focused-home?lang=eng
I think the problem is finding the middle ground on this. There are people who go to extremes on both sides on mercy and justice, or being too strict or to lenient, and they rely too much on their own judgement than that of the Spirit.
When you focus on the individual, and the others affected by it, understanding that they need to feel mercy to not give up, and justice to help them understand the boundaries, you begin to have a better idea of what is needed.
Post a Comment